Should we start locking people in mental hospitals against their wills as we did pre-1950s? - pre tens japonese
Today, you can not lock someone against his will, even if they are obviously seriously disturbed. Has Advocates for Mental Health, calls for the release of tens of thousands of patients in psychiatric hospitals in 1950 (only if the homeless population began to increase).
We should be sick at the time when he could lock up dangerous people?
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Pre Tens Japonese Should We Start Locking People In Mental Hospitals Against Their Wills As We Did Pre-1950s?
19 comments:
Yes - it's a prison.
The laws have changed in 70 years and increase the number of homeless and the incidence of violence and mass attacks. We must change what we do and begin the institutionalization of the most dangerous. The practice of locking them aside because he can most of the costs - but the cost of homelessness and violence to be higher. And there is little about the violation of civil liberties when they lock people up. It is a difficult problem.
I suspect you are in the U.S., here in Britain, and we can shut people for their own safety. This is called cutting and running from the observation of 24 hours for the Permanent Court for the public good. This is very dangerous lunatics, but the vast majority of them are divided no threat at all.
In fact, if one discovers a danger to themselves or society, they may limit to 2 weeks of observation, but no more than if they had never committed a crime.
I think we need to blocking people for life, but clearly disturbed.
People in the world are frightening and scary before you are locked a little crazy.
All together, the homeless people who have spoken publicly and delivered Hopsital spiritual life.
Those who have to refuse medication, they are blocked
In your own interest, naturally. I take all the homeless and placed in labor camps for their own good. If you are mentally ill or retarded, honest work will do no harm, and locked in a cage will not help. I'm serious.
No, because I could one of them.
Well, I have panic attacks, here and there, but if we go back to 1950, and they think I was possessed by evil spirits and locks.
We got out of that age, more b / TCH about.
No, because I could one of them.
Well, I have panic attacks, here and there, but if we go back to 1950, and they think I was possessed by evil spirits and locks.
We got out of that age, more b / TCH about.
No installation is available to add all of O'Reilly, Hannity, Beck and spectators.
No installation is available to add all of O'Reilly, Hannity, Beck and spectators.
ordered a lock-up condition "can be used to instruct a person against his will to the hospital.
The crooked politicians.
The crooked politicians.
I'd rather see the civil rights of people with mental illness, abandoned in place of mine to own a firearm
NO. If we did, that the Republicans run things out there.
No, we need these people, our army Voluntee
She shook me a long time. I'm with good locks.
I agree with Paul Revere. and while it was not always allow that children Preditor out! EVER!.
I worked for 20 years with severe mental illness to 4 years in a locked room, and compensation for the positions of direct care as well as the transition from the hospital. I started with the bizarre circumstances one can imagine to be treated. I have some scars, the nightmares of others. I have participated in their funerals and comforted his mother, I have tried to apply to the court, before all hell breaks loose. I feel a kinship with these people was a strong advocate for them, called on the carpet to have choices, doctors have not been released after a medical.
Transition to community-based outpatient treatment is paved with good intentions / attempts have failed, and the impressive success.
Hospitals are not shady, well-funded, inadequate, inappropriate and dangerous, I think I always had someone to fight every day.
Hospitals cost money, Member States can find cheaper, helping them to live in the community with some monitoring services.hospital is time to stabilize the crisis assessment after 72 hours, yes - SearchRosco left here .. I get calls to say "sent it back" and "go **** oh no, this can not mean it to be ..
This is not to say that they are probably more than any other area violence.no, but can also be dangerous for himself and the listener. the medications that help, but they are ill. be cut loose.
not find a lot of help, or actually control the world who are homeless, the prison, his only crime is just wrong on a project for society, if you couldnt fit not filled is set aside.
in Phoenix, was one of about 24 mentally ill people died in the heat .. exposed in the streets or vacant lots. There was an outcry, group homes and emergency services are boring, but they have rights, you can not avoid going out and pinched .. I have only two that are hit by cars to respect not always on it.
People can not be locked .. but somewhere there must be a balance, a place to stay or at least a landfill, where people could be tipped by pulling off.
Post a Comment